Well, enough RBFs are out there to defintely do this effectively. Same ground rules as before, only constructive criticism. Looking for feedback on ways we can improve the mag for you as the consumer.
So far I understand there is a love/hate thing on the articles, and have less 'filler' type stuff. ie, more scenario analysis, tactical articles, etc.
Something to understand. The basics for the next several issues are already laid out, but we can still incorporate recommendations for improvement. As of right now the content for issue 3 is changing somewhat from what I had previously posted, but in the end it is looking to be a very beefy issue, and I have been told already that it is even better than issue 2 I digress. Please let us know how to improve.