Infantry Combat ?

[ksbearski]

What exactly is wrong with the infantry combat model?

[junk2drive]

It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.

[Redwolf]

It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.

Good. It works much better that way.

[ksbearski]

It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.

Thanks for the breakdown of what's wrong. Although I don't see anything wrong with it either...

[Blackcloud6]

It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.

Are people trying to compare it to CM?

[junk2drive]

Yes. Isn't that expected?

[ksbearski]

Are people trying to compare it to CM?

Yes, I would agree. Comparisons are/were inevitable...

Two different concepts for which I have written an equation for:

ASL does not equal Panzer Leader/Panzerblitz

If ASL= CMBN and PCO = Panzer Leader/Panzerblitz, then CMBN does not equal PCO.

My variables date me...

ksbearski

[JMass]

If ASL= CMBN and PCO = Panzer Leader/Panzerblitz, then CMBN does not equal PCO.

I think that PCO is more Yaquinto's panzer than PL/PB... http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/4288/panzer