There's no questions the Germans operated differently on the Eastern Front than they elsewhere, that much is clear. But did the Soviets operate differently once they were in the West than they did on the Eastern Front?
There's no questions the Germans operated differently on the Eastern Front than they elsewhere, that much is clear. But did the Soviets operate differently once they were in the West than they did on the Eastern Front?
"I have always known about man. From the evidence, I believe his wisdom must walk hand and hand with his idiocy. His emotions must rule his brain. He must be a warlike creature who gives battle to everything around him, even himself." - Dr. Zaius
I get that. The context of my post and question at hand was that without brutality, the Nazi regime could not exist. France and as pointed out later, Denmark, were exceptions to that rule. If the same occupation practices of France and Denmark were employed in the Ukraine and Baltic states, one wonders if they would have had a more willing population to help the Germans seeing that they may have been "liberators" rather than replacing one tyrannical government with another. Hence, if you knew that you could not conquer the Soviet Union then the political aim of the invasion would have been to create a civil war and keep the Soviet Union fighting a civil war and thus occupied with itself for years to come. Hitler's easter border all of sudden becomes pretty secure.
I don't think a Rusdian civil war would have made much difference. The materiel disparity wold have required the output of most of the german factories be sent east to arm their side. The most Ukraine Estonia Latvia et al could have supplid would have been the man power.
The soviet armies crushed those opposed to them in much the same way as the US did in Vietnam but without the political reticence to limit their operations.
It comes down to army destruction and the ability to reconstitute. The Soviet Union was so large that the mere covering of distance wore out armies. Could the Germans have crushed another soviet army if given a free hand by the Grofaz? I think so. Would it have made a difference innthe end? No. The factors of size still remain.
What do we want? Time travel! When do we want it? It's irrelevant!
Practice safe eating...always use a condiment!
How on earth do you get that? His books are great because they compare what the German records say to what the Russian records say. The truth is in the narrow space between them.
I really don't get that he is compensating for some the earlier flawed works. Some of those earlier works are so flawed they should be moved to the fiction section.
Glantz' books are too dry and factual to have much room for spin.
To add my opinion.
I think the Germans could have pulled this off; only if they had a secured West Front, with Great Britian as a friend.
That could have freed up over 40 more fighting divisions in early 1941 to make the objectives of Leningrad and Moscow by October.
Kevin Kenneally
Charter member of the "OFF Squad"
Visiting your local Army Reserve & National Guard units to play ASL.
Bookmarks