PDA

View Full Version : Seen this before?


Mantis
18 Dec 02, 11:47
I'm cheating...

;)
Chuck?
18 Dec 02, 12:19
yes i found that interesting. I guess FDR decided to throw in a extra destroyer to get the deal done!
Palantir
18 Dec 02, 13:56
Originally posted by Mantis
I'm cheating...

;)


YES, WE ALREADY KNOW THAT. :rolleyes:
What else is new!!!! :p

Kerry :cheeky:
Mark Stevens
18 Dec 02, 17:29
I'm sure there's some incredibly complicated, sensible reason for it...
Kraut
18 Dec 02, 19:39
and this ..

http://mitglied.lycos.de/berger50/1.jpg

and this

http://mitglied.lycos.de/berger50/2.jpg

some more

http://mitglied.lycos.de/berger50/3.jpg

again...

http://mitglied.lycos.de/berger50/4.jpg

by the way, took me less than 2 min. to find thees... allies are cheaters ! :D
Ben Turner
18 Dec 02, 19:43
In the latter cases, I would say this is an example of the designer changing the figures for units which are only used as disbands (?), and not being bothered to go and find the specific equipment type to reduce the authorised equipment- and just reduced the assigned equipment instead.
Dan Neely
19 Dec 02, 01:56
Originally posted by Ben Turner
In the latter cases, I would say this is an example of the designer changing the figures for units which are only used as disbands (?), and not being bothered to go and find the specific equipment type to reduce the authorised equipment- and just reduced the assigned equipment instead.

None of what Kraut showed are disbands. To the list of cheaters, I'll add the seigfried forts.
Mantis
19 Dec 02, 09:55
On that last one of Kraut's, maybe the Allies should try to stuff another hundred Shermans in there when no one's looking... Try to make the division worthwhile!
Ben Turner
19 Dec 02, 14:19
a) Why the hell have the Russians got a unit with 90% proficiency?
b) 102 Shermans authorised to an Armoured division?
Mark Stevens
19 Dec 02, 18:17
The 90% Russian's an immobile fortress unit - we needed to do that to make them strong: the mobile Russian units are a lot weaker.